from the moment of the election! new travel laws designed to persecute Roma

AND VOTERS WERE TAUGHT TO BELIEVE IT WAS LABOUR that had become affected by a racism associated with the Nazi period ??

- This is sourced from the Conservative manifesto - https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/12/gypsies-travellers-boris-roma-crackdown-conservative-tory/?fbclid=IwAR2wq2noQ0xJeDJc3zdI7eHivKOPPrjK39RiPQMOm0MukHtG1u678Zu5MK4

My evil head teacher, at our breach in 1985: "Any society requires enforceable rules, even in mundane matters such as traffic control, laws are necessary. If a school is to function then it too has to have rules. Opinions may vary as to the type of rules required, but none the less rules there must be !

One Gypsy mother, who wished to remain anonymous due to the possibility of violent retaliation: “I will become a criminal everywhere I go. I would be a criminal staying on a friend’s farmyard, even if I was invited to visit. At motorway services. In a layby. Popping into the supermarket,” she said. “There is no minimum time frame mentioned. From the minute I apply the handbrake, and before I stop the engine, I will be illegal.”

The proposed laws would allow police to seize the homes of Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller people by force and to destroy their property without compensation. The proposal also says Travellers can be banned from the local authority area for up to a year, cutting off access to support for homelessness, which often requires someone to have been a resident in the area for a length of time, leaving many in fear of having to live on the streets.

#election2019 #travellers #Roma #Conservatives #antisemitism #homelessness #law

Perth march numbers shown as wild lies on video

The nat march in Perth Sep 7 was 3160. The lyingly claimed 20K would have stretched a great distance through the Letham housing estate where they started. The 3160 stretched for hardly a block.

A blow for the more defensively aggressive + closed minded flavour of nats in that region, than in the big central cities, who were awaiting the little march's arrival at North Inch park.

Amazing Perth Video Reveals March Lies As the subscript explains, the march was spread out by big gaps in it. To that I can add: it strted in 2 separated clumps. One beside the sports field, the other 2 minutes down the street.

The National has run an up-itself headline complaining that BBC news did nof report it. There are many things BBC news does not report, while it often reports praising itself: any thinking person should realise it has its own selective worldview like all news media have, and should look at several sources. The same as you would not trust the National on its own. But in this case, there is a reasonable point about newsworthiness that is getting made on the National's Facebook page. It has long since ceased to be newsworthy that largely the same 3K folks bus around and hold repetitive marches in different towns every few weeks of the year's warmer half, then lie that they were many times bigger than they were.

to revoke article 50 is the least gamble

British govt is at crisis point of having its hands tied by parliament against the exact thing it most wants to do. But will there turn out to be any point to it? For yet another EU extension is refusable, a danger that the Benn law does not deal with, + France's President Macron is already talking of refusing it. It was he who made the present extension shorter than the rest of the EU intended to make it. IT WOULD BE LESS OF A GAMBLE TO REVOKE ARTICLE 50, AND WE HAVE REACHED A POINT WHERE IT WOULD BE PERFECTLY DEMOCRATIC TOO.

We have never yet had a 3-way referendum, + our first will inevitably be beset by claims not to understand the process, encouraged by those who don't think it will go their way. It would have to be by the AV system itself defeated in a now-forgotten ref in 2011, the Tories won't agree to that, or else it could fail to produce a majority, fatal if its purpose is to resolve a deadlock !

To have a 2-way ref, you need to have a Leave option to offer in it, that the Leavers agree represents them, is not a robbery of their true position, + is fit for them to enact if it wins. There is none !

The Leavers were robbed by their own side, the ambiguity it pulled to hold itself together. For some Leavers only leaving with a deal was acceptable and they promised so in their campaign. For others only leaving with no deal was acceptable, now the Brexit Party's position: they avoided that in the campaign but have taken the Leave win as grounds to change the goalposts to that harder position. Both those camps within the Brexit movement hoped + gambled that winning a vote just for the principle called Leave should then let their camp prevail as the true form of Leave supported by reason.

That has not happened, the 2 camps are strong enough on their view of true Leave to fight each other + show that there is are actually majority feelings, national and parliamentary, against each camp. The majority consists of: the other Leave camp's purists + the Remainers. No dtheorists + debaters of referendums ever guessed such a Gordian knot. That a ref would be won for the principle of a step, offered in a papered-over alliance of 2 versions mutually unacceptable to enough of each other's supporters to make majorities against enacting either of them !

Hence it is perfectly democratic to revoke A50 until the Leavers sort that out or holdability of a 3-way ref gets sorted out. It's also less of a gamble to do this than go for either a ref or an extension request which Macron is already talking of refusing. Remainers, handed the chance of a legitimate default victory by the Leavers' divided positions, could still blow it + lose by similar division on the rightness + electoral daringness of revoking A50.

at crisis point how are they so unable to stop blowing it?

Worried by the outcome of Corbyn's meeting with all the opposition leaders.

Putting off a vote of confidence increases daily the odds of finding Johnson able to time an election for after Brexit is done. Legislating for yet another humiliating request for an extension! another! risks fed-up EU not agreeing to it. They are sounding lacking of plan of what another extension would be for.

If the Corbynites won't back a majority supported leader for a new govt for fear of it finishing Corbyn's leadership, and the Lib Dems would rather risk letting No-Deal happen than back Corbyn, and this even scuppers the much-expected move for a vote of confidence: then the opposition is divided and ruled and No-Deal happens.

The independence parties can sit in the middle of the row, outside the blame for it, and happy to see it keep the Union precarious. Corbyn + Swinson + their followers muat know that, + ths whole public know they must know that !

AUOB's naughty numbers

Unionist page A Force For Good is also Eurosceptical so does not speak for me on that. But it does a necessary job counting numbers on independence marches. I saw this was true in Ayr, where I went for a sunny beach day + to flyer the marchers' stalls against "civic nationalism"'s racism against descent citizenship.

• Ayr 6-7-19: 2672, claimed 13K
• Oban 15-6-19: 1757, claimed 7K
• Galashiels 1-6-19: 2122, claimed 5K
• Glasgow 4-5-19: 8796, claimed 100K
• Edinburgh 6-10-18: 12789, claimed 100K
• Dunfermline 1-9-18: 491
• Dundee 18-8-18: 3538, claimed 16K
• Inverness 28-7-18: 3386, claimed 14K

From A Force For Good's blog at www.aforceforgood.uk/single-post/2019/07/06/2672Ayr?fbclid=IwAR3lSd9nyQxpZL-x34YCXbRKELO93W8sUk7ccv08gEbtd_6pzQy1CCqH6cI

search yourself Lesley Riddoch

Riddoch has written a National column seizing on the opinion poll of Brexit-raving Tory menbers, that found a majority polling as preferring to lose Scotland than drop Brexit. Symptomatic of what Brexit has done to the Tories, and some commenters have suggested it comes from the weight of Brexiters who have joined the Tories to influence the leadership election. But the nats are all falling over it with glee.

They and Riddoch are making a logical fallacy typical of them, in declaring this the end of unionism. They are assuming that all u ionists are Tories. A piece of mud they would sneakily love to stick, and which makes no sense alongside what they often say on low Tory support here. i.e. the majority of Unionists are not Tories, and their Unionism is completely logically unaffected by the Tories' collective crack-up.

Here are Riddoch's words asked back to her. As I asked them back to her in a National site comment.

SHE WROTE

>
• As Stuart Campbell [Wings over Bath] pointed out: “Tories in Scotland and Northern Ireland are clinging to a nation from which their own Conservative colleagues would drop them like a ticking time-bomb ... at the first inconvenience.”
• Who knows if that revelation prompted any heart-searching amongst Union-supporting Scots ? ... So the question is worth asking again.
• Knowing that “fellow” arch Unionists would throw you and your nation to the wolves rather than miss the chance to trash their own economy by cutting ties with the European Union – how do you feel about the Union now? Indeed, how do you rate the thought processes of your erstwhile colleagues?
• What on earth are we waiting for? Even Scotland’s No voters must be asking themselves the very same question.

ASKED BACK TO HER

Lesley: you are a diaspora-born Scot who belongs to your nation by family. The White Paper does not give, and ever since it SNP and Yes have refused to give, unrefusable citizenship by the family connection route, parental descent. For 6 years you have faced the question, and you evaded it when asked by me at a meeting you did in Edinburgh Friends' Meeting House during the indyref:

• Why are you an eager leading voice of a movement that is racist against yourself ?
• Yessers who either are, or care about family/friends who are, parental descent Scots, are clinging to a nation from which their own Yes colleagues would drop them like a ticking time-bomb, by dogma without even waiting for an inconvenience.
• Who knows if that revelation prompted any heart-searching amongst indy-supporting Scots? So the question is worth asking again.
• Knowing that "fellow" arch Nats would throw you and your subset of your nation to the wolves rather than miss the chance to trash their own economy by cruelly dividing families in breach of ECHR article 8 - how do you feel about indy now? Indeed, how do you rate the thought processes of your erstwhile colleagues?
• As of Perth's recent hustings, Green leader Maggie Chapman has come round on parental descent citizenship. What are you waiting for? Even Scotland's SNP voters must be asking themselves the very same question.

Boris as an anti-racist card against SNP !

If Boris wins the druggies' naughty contest and becomes Prime Minister, he will be the second ever diaspora-born PM, relative to all Britain. First was the little known Bonar Law in 1922. That fact will actually give the Tories an advantage over the SNP in anti-racism! This makes unaffordable as well as ridiculous and obscene, for SNP and Yes to continue to cling to their racism against the offspring of our emigrants, and their ECHR-violating New Clearances hate policy against parental descent being an automatic entitler to citizenship.

When they ask us, do we want EU or Boris: how then is it going to look when a family-splitting cruel bigotry by SNP/Yes makes us invalid for EU, by non-compliance with ECHR article 8, petition 1448/2014 recording the EU's duty to disown shun and sanction us an a pariah racist state in international law for it, while the racist Brexit we are supposed to be escaping from is actually led by an example of what SNP/Yes is being racist against?

An example added to Angus Robertson, Lesley Riddoch, Mike Russell, Iain Macwhirter, 1930s SNP founder Eric Linklater, 1990s Plaid Cymru leader Dafydd Wigley who Salmond used to share election phone-ins with, and Ireland's indy leaders Eamonn da Valera and James Connolly.

(btw it has become accurate to say "SNP/Yes" since the welcome development recorded at Perth's recent hustings, that the Greens have come round to the right side of this issue.

videoed fascism

Perth4Europe videoed its hustings in Perth yesterday with a promise to publish it to give the hustings a wider reach.

It will show both good and bad news, botb progress and dug in bigotry, on the moral question that ruined Yes: citizenship by parental descent. It will show Green leader Maggie Chapman giving theright answer! at last doing what no Green would do during the indyref, placing them behind parental descent as one of the conferrers of citizenship.

But it will show SNP candidate Heather Anderson openly tell an audience "I'm not willing to do that" and parrot about the SNP being for civic not ethnic nationalism. The question had already cited European Convention on Human Rights article 8, family life, and how compliance with it is a condition for joining the EU.

Consider the reaction if a candidate declared as "not willing to say" black or Jewish citizenship? This is exactly the same, a stance of racial hatred of one branch of Scots - and when the sane candidate had even mentioned our emigration rate in her opening speech! What action would be available against a directly hateful election pledge to take citizenship away from a colour group? The same action applies against this.

It forms a decisive item in the legal evidence for population-scale racist crime in the Yes citizenship plan, and for ECHR requiring the EU to disown shun and sanction Scotland as an international pariah racist state if it goes Anderson's way.

Ireland saving Britain

If we don't no-deal Brexit this week, Ireland has saved us. This is impressive, Varadkar the Irish PM publicly warning the other countries off vetoing the extension. First time Britain will ever be saved by Ireland - it will change our history relationship! It will be new to gave that relationship with a separated former-UK country within the British Isles. It will be a big psychologival change on both sides, and fir Scittish nats looking at it from the Irush side too. - No longer will it be possible to see Britain as the roughshod oppressor over all that has happened between us,
news.sky.com/story/leo-varadkar-any-country-that-vetoed-brexit-delay-would-not-be-forgiven-11686447